An article appeared
recent in the Epoch Times questioning the importance of cursive writing in
today’s twenty-first century curriculum. It seems that in a society that is
using all sorts of abbreviations and shortcuts and where texting and emails
have replaced letter writing, that good old-fashioned handwriting may have
outlived its usefulness. The article noted that the new federal Common Core
standards no longer required cursive writing in the school curriculum. To date
45 states plus the District of Columbia have decided to subscribe to Common
Core. However it should be noted that a states
( like Florida or
Tennessee) can and have opted out and are still teaching
cursive writing.
Because of this
seminal change, there has been a schism between those who think that this is a good idea and those who do not. Proponents feel that jettisoning cursive is a good idea because more class time can be
spent on important academic subjects like math and science (STEM). Those
who feel that it is important to retain cursive writing in the curriculum believe that there are cognitive
benefits that can be derived from
teaching it. These advocates believe
that cursive can be an especially helpful tool in working with students with
disabilities.
So the question is out there for debate. Is the cursive
technique obsolete or still an important part of producing well rounded
literate and articulate student who can be successful in a twenty-first century
world?
You can find discussion of the divergent opinions about this issue at the following web links:
You are invited to join the conversation.
c.2014 J. Margolis
No comments:
Post a Comment