Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Revisiting Teach for America

A recent article in the New York Times observed that there has been a decline in applications in the Teach for America program. What started out as Wendy Kopp’s senior thesis while at Princeton University blossomed into a major service minded effort to get college graduates who were not trained to be teachers nor not initially interested in the teaching profession, to sign on for a two year commitment to teach in some of America’s poorest schools.  The responses to the Times article were as diverse as the recruits who answered Kopp’s call.
A former principal observed that he only recruited Teach for America recruits as a last resort. Two years is not nearly enough time to train a teacher. It seems that if a school wants to invest in a successful classroom teacher, the teacher must make a commitment to get on board for the long term.
Another respondent noted that Teach for America matches new teachers with children who really need the most skilled and experienced ones. This could be a recipe for disaster. She believed that such a program is endemic of the fact that teachers are not respected in the United States. In any other profession, who would insert a person into a complex situation with no skills in that occupation? Anybody cannot be a teacher!
One letter did note that Teacher for America has been a successful program and that many recruits did decide to make teaching a career.
Finally, one letter writer observed that Teach for America has become too large, impersonal and more “corporate.”

The jury is still out. What remains is the fact that this country needs both qualified as well as dedicated teachers to face the challenges of teaching children in this century.




c.2015 . J. Margolis

No comments:

Post a Comment